Reasoning : Logical Reasoning & Analytical Ability

Q 12 / 325

UPSC CSE Prelims 2026

Directions: Each item in this section contains a question followed by two statements. Answer each item using the following instructions and mark your response on the Answer Sheet accordingly. (a) Select this option if the question can be answered using one of these statements alone, but cannot be answered using other statement (b) Select this option if the question can be answered using either statement alone (c) Select this option if the question can be answered using both the statements together, but cannot be answered using either statement alone (d) Select this option if the question cannot be answered even using any of the statements
Question: X receives three coins of different denominations: 1, 2, 5, 10 and 20. If the total amount received by X is m, does X receive a coin of denomination 5?
  1. Statement I: m is not a prime number.
  2. Statement II: The sum of the digits of m is greater than 5.

EXPLANATION

The correct option is (a) - Select this option if the question can be answered using one of these statements alone, but cannot be answered using other statement.

[as per provisional answerkey]

Analysis

The question asks if X received a coin of denomination 5. X receives exactly three coins from the set {1, 2, 5, 10, 20}. Let's list all possible sums (m) of 3 distinct coins:
1+2+5=8
1+2+10=13
1+2+20=23
1+5+10=16
1+5+20=26
1+10+20=31
2+5+10=17
2+5+20=27
2+10+20=32
5+10+20=35
Possible values of m: {8, 13, 16, 17, 23, 26, 27, 31, 32, 35}

Statement I alone: m is not a prime number.
From our list, the non-prime (composite) values of m are: {8, 16, 26, 27, 32, 35}.
Let's check if these sums include a 5-unit coin:
8=(1+2+5) -> Yes
16=(1+5+10) -> Yes
26=(1+5+20) -> Yes
27=(2+5+20) -> Yes
32=(2+10+20) -> No
35=(5+10+20) -> Yes
Since m could be 32 (No) or any of the others (Yes), Statement I alone is not sufficient to give a definite "Yes" or "No". Note: While the official key suggests (a), logically Statement I allows for both possibilities. However, let's re-evaluate Statement II.

Statement II alone: The sum of the digits of m is greater than 5.
Let's check the sum of digits for all possible m:
8 (Sum: 8>5) -> Includes 5: Yes
13 (Sum: 4<5) -> No
16 (Sum: 7>5) -> Includes 5: Yes
17 (Sum: 8>5) -> Includes 5: Yes
23 (Sum: 5=5) -> No
26 (Sum: 8>5) -> Includes 5: Yes
27 (Sum: 9>5) -> Includes 5: Yes
31 (Sum: 4<5) -> No
32 (Sum: 5=5) -> No
35 (Sum: 8>5) -> Includes 5: Yes
For all values where the sum of digits is > 5 (m = 8, 16, 17, 26, 27, 35), the combination always includes a 5-unit coin. Therefore, Statement II alone is sufficient to answer "Yes".

Why the other options are incorrect

  • Option (b) - either statement alone: Statement I is insufficient because if m=32 (composite), the answer is No, but if m=8 (composite), the answer is Yes. Only Statement II provides a unique "Yes".
  • Option (c) - both together: This is incorrect because Statement II is sufficient on its own; we do not need the information from Statement I to reach a conclusion.
  • Option (d) - cannot be answered: This is incorrect because Statement II provides a definitive "Yes" to the question based on the exhaustive list of possible coin combinations.

Key Concept

This question tests the ability to perform exhaustive enumeration of possibilities and verify a logical condition against a subset of those possibilities to determine sufficiency.