Reasoning : Logical Reasoning & Analytical Ability

Q 47 / 325

UPSC CSE Prelims 2024

A Question is given followed by two Statements I and II. Consider the Question and the Statements.

A person buys three articles p, q and r for ₹50. The price of the article q is ₹16 which is the least.
Question: What is the price of the article p?
Statement-I: The cost of p is not more than that of r.
Statement-II: The cost of r is not more than that of p.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above Question and the Statements?

EXPLANATION

Correct Option (B)

The problem provides the following information:

  • The sum of the prices of three articles p, q, and r is ₹50: p + q + r = 50.
  • The price of article q is ₹16, which is the least among the three: q = 16.

From this, we can deduce:

  • Substituting q = 16 into the sum equation: p + 16 + r = 50, which simplifies to p + r = 34.
  • Since q = 16 is the least price, it implies that p > q and r > q. Therefore, p > 16 and r > 16.
  • Assuming prices are positive integers, the minimum possible integer value for p and r is 17.

Now, let's evaluate each statement:

Statement I: "The cost of p is not more than that of r."

  • This can be expressed as p ≤ r.
  • We have the conditions: p + r = 34, p ≥ 17, r ≥ 17, and p ≤ r.
  • If p = 17, then r = 34 - 17 = 17. This satisfies p ≤ r (17 ≤ 17).
  • If p were less than 17, it would violate p ≥ 17.
  • If p were greater than 17, then r would be less than 17 (since p + r = 34), which would violate r ≥ 17.
  • Thus, the only integer solution satisfying all conditions is p = 17 and r = 17.
  • Therefore, Statement I alone is sufficient to determine the price of article p.

Statement II: "The cost of r is not more than that of p."

  • This can be expressed as r ≤ p.
  • We have the conditions: p + r = 34, p ≥ 17, r ≥ 17, and r ≤ p.
  • If r = 17, then p = 34 - 17 = 17. This satisfies r ≤ p (17 ≤ 17).
  • If r were less than 17, it would violate r ≥ 17.
  • If r were greater than 17, then p would be less than 17 (since p + r = 34), which would violate p ≥ 17.
  • Thus, the only integer solution satisfying all conditions is p = 17 and r = 17.
  • Therefore, Statement II alone is sufficient to determine the price of article p.

Since both Statement I alone and Statement II alone are sufficient to answer the question, the question can be answered by using either statement alone.

Incorrect Options:

Option A is incorrect because the question can be answered by using either statement alone, not just one but not the other.

Option C is incorrect because the question can be answered by either statement alone; it is not necessary to use both statements together, nor is it true that it cannot be answered by either statement alone.

Option D is incorrect because the question can be definitively answered by using either statement alone, indicating that it is not unanswerable even with both statements.